Case Details

Year Initiated/Committed

2020

Settlement Amount

n/a

Court

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Docket Number

20-cv-3539

Lead State

CT

Participating States

AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, GU, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, PR, RI, SC, TN, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV

Defendant(s)

Sandoz, Inc.; Actavis Holdco US, Inc.; Actavis Elizabeth LLC; Actavis Pharma, Inc.; Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC; Ara Aprahamian; Aurobindo Pharma U.S.A., Inc.; Bausch Health Americas, Inc.; Bausch Health US, LLC; Mitchell Blashinsky; Douglas Boothe; Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA; James (Jim) Grauso; Greenstone LLC; G&W Laboratories, Inc.; Walter Kaczmarek; Armando Kellum; Lannett Company, Inc.; Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Mallinckrodt Inc.; Mallinckrodt LLC; Mallinckrodt PLC; Mylan Inc.; Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Kurt Orlofski; Michael Perfetto; Perrigo New York, Inc.; Pfizer Inc.; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Teligent, Inc.; Erika Vogel-Baylor; John Wesolowski; Wockhardt USA LLC

Case Description

Plaintiff states filed a third lawsuit stemming from the ongoing antitrust investigation into a widespread conspiracy by generic drug manufacturers to artificially inflate and manipulate prices, reduce competition, and unreasonably restrain trade for generic drugs sold across the United States. The complaint focuses on 80 topical generic drugs  and names 26 corporate Defendants and 10 individual Defendants. The topical drugs at the center of the Complaint include creams, gels, lotions, ointments, shampoos, and solutions used to treat a variety of skin conditions, pain, and allergies. The states seek damages, civil penalties, and injunctive relief to restore competition to the generic drug market. This case was filed in Connecticut, but consolidated in an MDL in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.