Maryland v. C & C Development, Inc., C.I. No. 291344017 (Cir. Ct. for Baltimore City, 1991).
Bid-rigging conspiracy with state employee.
Maryland v. Myers, C.I. 292037009 (Cir. Ct. for Baltimore City 1991).
Project manager for state conspired to rig bids on construction contracts.
Maryland v. ARC Asbestos Removal Co., C.I. 19012022 (Cir. Ct. for Baltimore City 1990)
Agreement to rig bids on insulation jobs.
People v. Donald Sherwin, C030485 (Cal. Ct. App. 3d App. Dist.)8/15/00)
State indicted defendants on conspiracy to rig bids for supplying foodstuffs to state, undermining state’s small business preferences and perjury. After defendants’ motion for suppression of evidence was granted, case was dismissed.
Minnesota v. Tim Amdahl Chevrolet Co., No. K5-93-0677 (Winona Cty. Dist. Ct.)
Auto body repair shops conspired to fix prices by providing sham estimates on competitors’ letterhead.
Minnesota v. Walz Buick Oldsmobile GMC, Inc.,, No. K9-93-0679 (Winona Cty Dist. Ct.)
Defendant auto body repair shop fixed prices by providing sham estimates on competitors’ letterhead.
Minnesota v. Sugar Loaf Ford Lincoln Mercury Inc., No. K7-93-0678,
Defendants were sued criminally and civilly for scheme through which they provide sham estimates for body work.
Minnesota v. Nystrom Motors, Inc., No. K5-93-0680 (Winona Cty. Dist. Ct. 1993)
Auto body shops agreed to provide false estimates for body work to be provided to auto insurance companies.
Wisconsin v. Medical Technologies, Inc., No. 93CF857 (Dane Cnty. Cir. Ct. filed
Market allocation agreement among distributors of hearing testing equipment, beginning in 1990
Wisconsin vs. Industrial Roofing Services and Edward J. Frac, Case No. 93-CF-0343 and 93-CM-0928, Circuit Court Milwaukee County (June 1993)
The complaint alleged that Frac, acting on behalf of IRS, coordinated the submission of non-competitive bids on two roofing repair jobs
