Delaware v. The Lansdell Corp. of Md., Inc., No. 7174, (Del. Ch. filed Apr. 29, 1983)

Delaware sought civil penalties, equitable relief, damages, fees and costs, alleging Defendant, The Lansdell Corporation of Maryland, Inc., participated in conspiracies to rig bids in connection with the supply of liquid asphalt in the State of Delaware

Read More →

Delaware v. Better Roads Corp., No. 7199, (Del. Ch. filed Jun. 1, 1983)

Delaware sought civil penalties, equitable relief, damages, fees and costs, alleging Defendant, Better Roads Corp., participated in conspiracies to rig bids in connection with the supply of liquid asphalt in the State of Delaware.

Read More →

Delaware v. Camelot Mobile Home Park, Inc., No. 6425 (Del. Ch. filed Apr. 10, 1981).

Delaware sought civil penalties, injunctive relief, damages, fees and costs, alleging Defendant, Camelot Mobile Home Park, Inc. engaged in an illegal tying arrangement by conditioning the lease of a lot upon the purchase of a new mobile home.

Read More →

Delaware v. The Asphalt Service Company, No. 7180, (Del. Ch. filed May 5, 1983)

Delaware sought civil penalties, equitable relief, damages, fees and costs, alleging Defendant, the Asphalt Service Company, participated in conspiracies to rig bids in connection with the supply of liquid asphalt in the State of Delaware.

Read More →

Delaware v. Bayshore, Inc., No. 6424 (Del. Ch. filed Apr. 10, 1981).

Delaware sought civil penalties, injunctive relief, damages, fees and costs, alleging Defendant, Bayshore, Inc. engaged in an illegal tying arrangement by conditioning the lease of a lot upon the purchase of a new mobile home.

Read More →

Maine v. Maine Chiropractic Association , Inc., No. CV-99-135 (Kennebec County, June 1999)

Settlement with Chiropractic Association regarding price-fixing and group boycott.

Read More →

Utah v. Hitachi Sales Corp. of America, No. 880026602 (1st Dist. Cr. Cache Cty Utah 1988)

State alleged Hitachi and its distributors had coerced certain dealers into raising their prices by means of a concerted refusal to deal.

Read More →

Connecticut v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. (In re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation), MDL No. 1290 (D.D.C. June 15, 2000) 205 F.R.D. 369 (D.D.C. 2002); No. 98 CV 3115 (D.D.C. 2000) – complaint

Plaintiff States alleged that Mylan Laboratories, Inc.(Mylan) and other drug companies entered into illegal agreements to monopolize the market for certain generic anti-anxiety drugs.

Read More →

In the Matter of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, No. 95-3591A (Mass. Super. Ct. Suffok Cty. June 22, 1995)

State settled (through Assurance of Discontinuance) charges that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts solicited or agreed to solicit a boycott of Hillcrest Hospital in Pittsfield, Massachusetts while Blue Cross was in contract negotiations with another Pittsfield hospital.

Read More →

In the Matter of Ralph’s & Yucaipa Companies

Merger of two southern California supermarket chains, parties entered into consent decree to divest 27 stores.

Read More →