Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us

Illinois Attorney General Must Produce Documents from Non-Party State Agencies

Home / NAAG, Attorneys General / Illinois Attorney General Must Produce Documents from Non-Party State Agencies
January 2, 2024 NAAG, Attorneys General, Powers and Duties
Share this

  • Emily Myers
    Antitrust Counsel and Chief Editor
    National Association of Attorneys General

The state of Illinois sued Monsanto and several other companies alleging that they contaminated the environment by producing toxic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and caused environmental harm to the state’s air, water, wildlife and natural resources.

Monsanto sought discovery from state agencies, arguing that that Illinois attorney general has a legal right to obtain those documents and should therefore be required to produce responsive documents in the possession, custody or control of state agencies. The attorney general argued that such production would infringe on the separation of powers between the attorney general and the governor, and that the attorney general does not have an “unfettered legal right” to obtain documents from non-party state agencies. The magistrate judge disagreed and found that the attorney general was required to produce the documents.

The court began by noting that the state’s complaint references the state’s Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture, and Department of Public Health. The state’s complaint also states that it “intersects with the missions of these agencies, that the funds the AG would recover would, in part, compensate the State for what the agencies have spent on behalf of the public, that the state agencies possess information relevant to this case, and that the AG asserts claims under statutes otherwise administered by state agencies.” However, no state agency entered an appearance in the case. The court noted that by holding that the attorney general, operating under his parens patriae authority, must produce responsive documents possessed by state agencies, it was not joining any state agency as a party.

Turning to the question of separation of powers, the court agreed that the attorney general is the chief legal officer of the state while the governor is the supreme executive power. However, no Illinois court has held that non-party state agencies cannot be subject to party discovery when the attorney general sues as parens patriae and the court distinguished cases from Ohio and New Mexico, in part on the grounds that the Illinois attorney general’s office has common law authority and New Mexico’s attorney general does not.

Since it found no constitutional bar to requiring the attorney general to provide discovery from state agencies, the court turned to the question of control of the documents. Monsanto argued that the attorney general’s broad, constitutionally-based authority to serve as the chief legal officer of the state must include a legal right to obtain documents from state agencies; and that because the attorney general has broad authority to manage and control litigation on behalf of state agencies, he must have a legal right to obtain documents from those agencies. The attorney general responded that he did not have an unfettered right to access state agency documents and that the governor controls the agencies, so the attorney general has no authority to compel the agencies to produce the documents.

The court held, under the specific circumstances of this litigation, “principles of fundamental fairness weigh in favor of allowing Rule 34 documents requests to encompass responsive documents in the possession of the state agencies expressly referenced in the State’s Complaint, who undoubtedly hold many relevant documents and stand to benefit from the Attorney General’s success in the case.”

The court distinguished several cases cited by the attorney general. In Gold King Mine Release in San Juan Cnty., Colorado, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41591 (D.N.M. Mar. 5, 2021),  a procedurally similar case in New Mexico, that district court ruled that the New Mexico attorney general had no authority to respond to discovery requests directed at New Mexico state agencies because of the separation of powers between the attorney general and the governor. However, the court here found that “the New Mexico Attorney General’s powers differ from that of the Illinois Attorney General. Indeed, the New Mexico Attorney General only retains her power via statute, whereas the Illinois Attorney General has both statutory powers and more expansive common law authority.” The court also distinguished an Ohio case on the grounds that the Ohio supreme court had ruled that “Ohio’s constitutional structure prevents the court from aggregating state agencies as parties and treating them as such for purposes of discovery.”  However, in this case, there is no similar Illinois supreme court decision.

The court next looked at factors determining “control” in the context of private parties. In particular, the court applied two factors of a seven-factor test articulated in another case in the Northern District of  Illinois:  “(1) whether the party and the related non-party exchange documents in the ordinary course of business; and (2) whether there is any benefit or involvement by the non-party in the litigation.” In this case, the court found that the attorney general’s office and the agencies exchange documents in the ordinary course of business, especially since the attorney general manages and controls litigation involving the agencies. The court also found that since the state seeks to recover damages for agency expenses and their objectives with respect to the environment and public health are the same, there is involvement by the non-party state agencies in this litigation.

Finally, the court did not agree with the state that third-party discovery would be sufficient. Although in a similar Ohio case Monsanto did receive three million pages of discovery from Ohio state agencies through third-party discovery, the process took two years and was inefficient. This inefficiency is inconsistent with Rule 26’s underlying design that “directing that the scope of discovery should be informed by . . . the parties’ relative access to the relevant information and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit.”

The court ordered the attorney general to produce responsive documents from the agencies named in the complaint, but held that Monsanto must use third-party discovery for documents from any other state agencies. People ex rel. Raoul v. Monsanto, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106151 (N.E. Ill. June 20, 2023)

Related Posts

Related Posts

powers and duties, attorney general powers

Recent Attorney General Powers and Duties Cases—In Brief | Late 2024

powers and duties, attorney general powers

Recent Attorney General Powers and Duties Cases — In Brief | Early 2025

Shows no photo available image placeholder

NAAG Announces 2024 Annual Award Recipients for Exceptional Service to the Attorney General Community

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2025 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, docx, xls, Max. file size: 50 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
        To provide you more clarity about how we collect, store and use personal information, and your rights to control that information, we have updated our privacy policy, which also explains how we use cookies. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.I Agree