Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us

Personal Jurisdiction Over Attorneys General in Out-of-State Federal Courts

Home / Powers and Duties / Personal Jurisdiction Over Attorneys General in Out-of-State Federal Courts
August 17, 2021 Powers and Duties
Share this

  • Emily Myers
    Antitrust Counsel and Chief Editor
    National Association of Attorneys General

Two recent decisions in California and Arkansas reached different conclusions as to the court’s jurisdiction over a state attorney general based on the issuance of civil investigative demands (CIDs).

In the more recent case, Twitter, Inc. v. Paxton, No. 21-cv-01644 (N.D. Cal. May 11, 2021), the Texas Attorney General’s Office (AGO) issued a CID to Twitter, seeking information for an investigation about possible violations of Texas’s consumer protection law. Instead of responding, Twitter sued Attorney General Paxton in federal court in the Northern District of California, alleging a violation, under section 1983, of Twitter’s First Amendment rights to moderate its platform as it wants.

The court first decided that it had personal jurisdiction over Attorney General Paxton, because Supreme Court precedent supports jurisdiction when a plaintiff alleges that a defendant “engaged in retaliatory conduct expressly aimed at chilling the speech of a [state] resident.” The allegation in the complaint is sufficient, according to the court, to give the court jurisdiction over the defendant.

The court then turned to the question of subject matter jurisdiction. Twitter argued that the Ninth Circuit has recognized a First Amendment retaliation claim based on a theory that the defendant subjected the plaintiff to a retaliatory investigation. One element of this claim is that the defendant’s “actions would chill a person of ordinary firmness from continuing to engage in the protected activity.“ In this case, the Texas AGO has no authority to impose any sanction for a failure to comply with its CIDs. The AGO would instead have to go to court to enforce the CID, “where the only possible consequence adverse to Twitter would be a judicial finding that the CID, contrary to Twitter’s assertion, is enforceable.” There are no fines or penalties that can be imposed by the AGO on its own, because CIDs are not self-executing. As the attorney general has so far taken no action to enforce the CID, Twitter’s suit was premature and was dismissed.

On the other hand, Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge was not subject to the personal jurisdiction of a Missouri federal court simply by sending letters seeking information in a consumer protection case. Morningside Church, Inc. v. Rutledge, No. 3:20-cv-05050 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 27, 2020). After receiving complaints from several consumers, the Arkansas Attorney General’s Office sought information from several defendants through a CID about fraudulent health claims in connection with a supposed COVID-19 cure. After negotiating the scope of the CID and receiving objections and incomplete answers, the attorney general’s office sent a letter seeking complete information and stating that the state would seek a court order if responses were not received by June 12. On June 5, the plaintiffs filed suit against the state in federal court in Missouri, alleging that the attorney general’s CIDs and any follow-up actions infringed on their rights of religious freedom and other constitutional rights.

The Arkansas Attorney General’s Office argued that the court does not have personal jurisdiction over the office because the two letters sent to the plaintiffs in Missouri are not sufficient “minimum contacts” to provide personal jurisdiction. The court noted that the attorney general has authority “to protect the State of Arkansas and the general public as consumers from illegal, fraudulent, or deceptive practices” as well as the authority to investigate such practices. In this case, the attorney general, through her investigation, did not purposefully avail her office of the “benefits and protections of the forum state to such a degree that her office should reasonably anticipate being haled into court here based on their actions.”

Attorney General Rutledge also argued that the court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction because “a suit for declaratory judgment aimed solely at wresting the choice of forum from the ‘natural’ plaintiff will normally be dismissed,”. The plaintiffs argued that they were the first to file suit and the court should not abstain. The court noted that Eighth Circuit precedent considers the plaintiffs’ knowledge of the state’s intent to seek enforcement of its CID and the plaintiffs’ filing of a declaratory judgment action to be “red flags” indicating that a court should abstain, but since there were insufficient minimum contacts, there was no personal jurisdiction over the attorney general’s office. The court dismissed the case.

Related Posts

Related Posts

powers and duties, attorney general powers

Recent Attorney General Powers and Duties Cases—In Brief | Late 2024

powers and duties, attorney general powers

Recent Attorney General Powers and Duties Cases — In Brief | Early 2025

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2025 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, docx, xls, Max. file size: 50 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top
    To provide you more clarity about how we collect, store and use personal information, and your rights to control that information, we have updated our privacy policy, which also explains how we use cookies. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.I Agree