Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Report: Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic Int’l, Inc., 21-1043

Home / Supreme Court / Supreme Court Report: Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic Int’l, Inc., 21-1043
November 17, 2022 Supreme Court
Share this

  • Dan Schweitzer
    Director, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
    National Association of Attorneys General

 

Volume 30, Issue 2

This Report summarizes cases granted review on November 4 and 10, 2022

Case Granted Review: Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic Int’l, Inc., 21-1043

Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic Int’l, Inc., 21-1043. The question presented is “[w]hether the court of appeals erred in applying the Lanham Act extraterritorially to petitioners’ foreign sales, including purely foreign sales that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers.” The Lanham Act provides a cause of action against anyone who “use[s] in commerce” a “counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark” in a way “likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. §1114(1)(a). It also creates a right of action against anyone who uses in commerce any word, symbol, or device that is likely to confuse or deceive consumers about the origin of goods. Id. §1125(a)(1). The Court has considered the Act’s application to foreign conduct once before, in Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., 344 U.S. 280 (1952). There, it held the Lanham Act could apply to “acts of trade-mark infringement and unfair competition consummated in a foreign country by a citizen and resident of the United States” where the products were sold in Mexico but trickled into the United States and “essential steps” in the scheme were taken in the United States.

Petitioners are German and Austrian companies that sell radio remote controls for heavy equipment. Petitioners long distributed respondent Hetronic’s remote controls. In more recent years, petitioners also began manufacturing identical remote controls, claiming that they, not Hetronic, own the rights to the trademarks. Petitioners sold about $240,000 worth of these identical remote controls in the U.S. Additionally, around 1.7 million euros worth of the products sold abroad made their way into the U.S.—about three percent of petitioners’ $90 million in total sales. Hetronic sued petitioners in U.S. district court. A jury awarded Hetronic $96 million in damages, reflecting all of petitioners’ worldwide sales, and the district court entered a permanent worldwide injunction. The Tenth Circuit affirmed in relevant part. 10 F.4th 1016. It recognized that there is a circuit split regarding whether and when the Lanham Act applies to foreign sales by foreign corporations. It adopted a test that asks first if the defendant is a U.S. citizen; if so, the Lanham Act likely applies. If not, it then asks whether the activity at issue has a substantial effect on U.S. commerce. If it does, it finally asks “whether extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act would create a conflict with trademark rights established under the relevant foreign law.” Because petitioners are foreign corporations and did not argue the third element, the appeal turned on the second element—substantial effect. The Tenth Circuit found substantial effect, noting that millions of euros worth of infringing products made their way into the U.S. Although this was a small proportion of total sales, the Tenth Circuit held that “it’s irrelevant what proportion of Defendants’ global sales entered the United States” because “[o]therwise, billion-dollar-revenue companies could escape Lanham Act liability by claiming that millions of dollars of their infringing products entering the United States represented only a fraction of their sales.” Additionally, the Tenth Circuit held that Hetronic had established substantial effect because petitioners had diverted tens of millions of dollars in international sales that Hetronic could otherwise have made.

Petitioners argue that the Tenth Circuit erred in extending the Lanham Act’s reach extraterritorially. They point out that “[w]hen a statute gives no clear indication of an extraterritorial application, it has none.” Morrison v. Nat’l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 255 (2010). The Lanham Act does not state that it applies in foreign countries and thus should not apply extraterritorially. Petitioners argue that the Tenth Circuit’s “diversion of foreign sales from a U.S. company” theory has no limiting principle and “would allow the Lanham Act—a statute concerned with preventing domestic consumer confusion—to be asserted extraterritorially whenever a U.S. plaintiff claims lost sales abroad, on the theory that monetary loss to a U.S. plaintiff anywhere in the world is a ‘loss to U.S. commerce’ warranting extraterritorial application.” They argue that the Tenth Circuit’s interpretation is unmoored from the Lanham Act’s focus on “confusion,” “mistake,” or “dece[ption]” of American consumers. 15 U.S.C. §§1114(1)(a), 1125(a)(1). Additionally, petitioners claim that the Tenth Circuit’s decision is at odds with international law requiring each country’s trademark law to have only domestic application. Next, they argue, the Tenth Circuit’s expansive interpretation of the Lanham Act should not be embraced because the Act as so interpreted would exceed Congress’s powers under the Foreign Commerce Clause. Finally, petitioners suggest that Steele should be overruled or confined to its facts because it cannot be squared with the Court’s subsequent holding that a statute will be applied extraterritorially only if its language explicitly says it should.

Related Posts

Related Posts

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 20

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 13

Supreme Court Report, Volume 32, Issue 6

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2025 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, docx, xls, Max. file size: 50 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
        To provide you more clarity about how we collect, store and use personal information, and your rights to control that information, we have updated our privacy policy, which also explains how we use cookies. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.I Agree