Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Report: Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 21-908

Home / Supreme Court / Supreme Court Report: Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 21-908
May 19, 2022 Supreme Court
Share this

  • Dan Schweitzer
    Director, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
    National Association of Attorneys General

Volume 29, Issue 13

This Report summarizes opinions issued on April 28 and May 2, 2022 (Part I); and cases granted review on April 25 and May 2, 2022 (Part II).

Case Granted Review: Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 21-908

Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 21-908. The Court will consider whether a debtor may discharge in bankruptcy a debt for money obtained by her business partner’s fraud, when the debtor herself had no knowledge of the fraud. David and Kate Bartenwerfer renovated a house in San Francisco and sold it to Kieran Buckley. After the sale, Buckley sued the Bartenwerfers in state court for multiple claims, including nondisclosure of defects. Kate and David were unmarried during the renovation and sale, but they married before the lawsuit. A jury found in Buckley’s favor and awarded him damages. The Bartenwerfers then filed for bankruptcy. In the bankruptcy court, Buckley argued that the state judgment could not be discharged in bankruptcy because 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) prohibits discharge of a debt for money that was obtained through fraud. The bankruptcy court agreed and held that the portion of the judgment traceable to the nondisclosure was nondischargeable. The court found that David had actual knowledge of the false representations made to Buckley, and that his fraudulent conduct could be imputed to Kate because of their partnership. The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) adopted a “knew or should have known” standard and remanded the case with instructions that the bankruptcy court determine whether Kate knew or should have known of David’s fraud. After an evidentiary hearing, the bankruptcy court held that David’s fraud could not be imputed to Kate because she did not know of it, and her debt was therefore dischargeable. The BAP affirmed. A Ninth Circuit panel reversed. 860 Fed. Appx. 544.

The Ninth Circuit held that that a person cannot escape liability of her business partner’s fraud due to lack of knowledge. The court quoted Strang v. Bradner, 114 U.S. 555, 561 (1885), for the proposition that “if, in the conduct of partnership business, . . . one partner makes false or fraudulent misrepresentations of fact to the injury of innocent person, . . . his partners cannot escape pecuniary responsibility therefor upon the ground that such misrepresentations were made without their knowledge. This is especially so when . . . the partners, who were not themselves guilty of wrong, received and appropriated the fruits of the fraudulent conduct of their associate in business.” The court accordingly ruled that “the bankruptcy court applied the incorrect legal standard for imputed liability in a partnership relationship,” and found petitioner’s debt “nondischargeable regardless of her knowledge of the fraud.”

Kate argues in her petition that Strang has been “misinterpreted to cover issues that were not part of the Court’s actual analysis.” In Kate’s view, Strang focused on the imputation of liability between partners, and simply “assumed away” the issue of discharge. Moreover, Kate argues, Strang was superseded by statutory amendment and subsequent decisions such as Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 569 U.S. 267 (2013), and Field v. Mans, 516 U.S. 59 (1995), which require some level of scienter. Kate urges the Court to adopt the Eighth Circuit’s rule that a debt may be discharged unless the debtor knew or should have known of her partner’s fraud or was “recklessly indifferent” to the partner’s conduct. Walker v. Citizens State Bank, 726 F.2d 452 (8th Cir. 1984). She argues that Walker is consistent with the statutory exception from discharge for debt obtained by “false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud,” as well as the historical requirement of “positive fraud or fraud in fact,” which was understood by the drafters of §523(a)(2)(A). Kate maintains that Walker avoids creating new non-statutory exceptions from discharge, and it furthers the goal of providing relief to the “honest but unfortunate debtor.”

Buckley responds that, as explained in Deodati v. M.M. Winkler & Assocs., 239 F.3d 746 (5th Cir. 2001), the statute’s text “focuses on the character of the debt, not the culpability of the debtor.” Section 523(a)(2)(A) excepts from discharge “any debt . . . for money . . . obtained by . . . actual fraud,” and Kate undisputedly owes a debt for money obtained by her partner’s actual fraud. Buckley argues that the Court should not rewrite the statute by adding language that the debtor “knew or should have known” of the fraud, or that the fraud must have been committed “by the debtor.” Buckley asserts that the statute’s context, history, and purpose confirm his interpretation. For example, §523 expressly makes the debtor’s state of mind relevant to the discharge of some kinds of debt, but the fraud provision contains no such requirement. Buckley argues that Strang considered the discharge obligations of innocent business partners, yet adopted a rule that protects fraud victims over a fraudster’s partners. Buckley insists that this principle has been followed for many years, and Congress has not departed from it. He argues that the cases upon which Kate relies simply show that the fraudster himself must have some level of scienter; those cases did not consider the partner-debtor’s scienter. And although one purpose of the Bankruptcy Code is to give a fresh start to honest debtors, Buckley says that in this instance Congress reasonably concluded that creditors’ interests are more important.

Related Posts

Related Posts

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 20

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 13

Supreme Court Report, Volume 32, Issue 6

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2025 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, docx, xls, Max. file size: 50 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top
    To provide you more clarity about how we collect, store and use personal information, and your rights to control that information, we have updated our privacy policy, which also explains how we use cookies. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.I Agree