Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Report: Egbert v. Boule, 21-147

Home / Supreme Court / Supreme Court Report: Egbert v. Boule, 21-147
November 9, 2021 Supreme Court
Share this

  • Dan Schweitzer
    Director, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
    National Association of Attorneys General

November 9, 2021
Volume 29, Issue 3

This Report summarizes cases granted review on October 29 and November 5, 2021 (Part I).

Cases Granted Review: Egbert v. Boule, 21-147

Egbert v. Boule, 21-147. The Court limited the grant of certiorari to the first two questions, which ask: (1) “Whether a cause of action exists under Bivens for First Amendment retaliation claims.” (2) “Whether a cause of action exists under Bivens for claims against federal officers engaged in immigration-related functions for allegedly violating a plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights.” (The Court declined to grant certiorari on the third question presented, which asked the Court to consider overruling Bivens.) Respondent Robert Boule operates a Bed & Breakfast steps away from the Canadian border in Blaine, Washington. The B&B is known as “Smuggler’s Inn,” and is “a notorious site for illegal border crossing.” The Inn also attracts drug traffickers; “[l]arge shipments of cocaine, methamphetamine, ecstasy, and opiates” have been seized on site. On March 20, 2014, petitioner, U.S. Border Patrol Agent Erik Egbert, was on patrol and learned from Boule that a Turkish national was arriving at the Smuggler’s Inn later that day. Agent Egbert suspected the Turkish national might cross into Canada or meet with associates entering the United States from Canada for a criminal purpose. Agent Egbert therefore waited for Boule’s employees to drive the Turkish national to the Smuggler’s Inn. Once they arrived, Agent Egbert followed them up the Inn’s driveway and parked behind Boule’s vehicle. The driver exited; the Turkish national remained in the car. Boule told Agent Egbert to leave the premises, but Agent Egbert declined. Boule responded by stepping between Agent Egbert and the car with the Turkish national. Agent Egbert allegedly pushed Boule aside, asked the Turkish national about his immigration status, and confirmed his lawful presence. Boule later sought medical treatment for a back injury that Agent Egbert allegedly caused. Boule complained to Agent Egbert’s superiors. Boule alleges that Agent Egbert retaliated by siccing the IRS and other federal agencies on him.  Boule sued Agent Egbert in federal district court, asserting two causes of action under Bivens. He alleged that Agent Egbert (1) retaliated against Boule in violation of the First Amendment, and (2) violated Boule’s Fourth Amendment rights by entering his property, refusing to leave, and pushing him to the ground. The district court granted summary judgment to Agent Egbert on both claims. A panel of the Ninth Circuit reversed and held that both Bivens claims were viable. 998 F.3d 370 (amended opinion). Twelve judges dissented from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Under recent Supreme Court precedents, resolving whether a Bivens claim is available is a two-step process. The first step asks whether the claim arises in a context different from what the Court has previously recognized. If so, the next step considers whether any special factors counsel hesitation before expanding Bivens to that new context. See Hernandez v. Mesa, 140 S. Ct. 735 (2020). With respect to Boule’s First Amendment claim, the Ninth Circuit panel reasoned that Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006), “explicitly stated . . . that such a [Bivens] claim may be brought,” even if “the [Supreme] Court has not expressly so held.” The Ninth Circuit then found “no special factors that make it inadvisable to find a cognizable Bivens claim in this new context.” As to Boule’s Fourth Amendment claim, the Ninth Circuit panel reasoned that extending Bivens to Border Patrol agents was a “modest extension” that would not entail “improper intrusion by the judiciary into the sphere of the other branches.” The panel deemed Boule’s excessive-force claim “indistinguishable from Fourth Amendment excessive force claims that are routinely brought under Bivens against F.B.I. agents.”

Agent Egbert argues in his petition that “six circuits to consider the availability of First Amendment retaliation claims under Bivens have rejected them. And three circuits have refused to recognize Fourth Amendment Bivens claims in factually analogous circumstances involving immigration enforcement.” On the First Amendment claim, Egbert says that other circuits reject the Ninth Circuit’s reading of Hartman, finding that in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 675 (2009), and Reichle v. Howards, 566 U.S. 658, 663 n.4 (2012), the Court expressly disavowed recognizing any First Amendment Bivens claims. And on both the First and Fourth Amendment claims, Egbert asserts many special factors counseling hesitation in expanding Bivens to these new contexts: “Th[e] Court’s unwillingness to extend Bivens”; “[o]ther circuits’ uniform refusal to entertain claims in these contexts”; “Hernandez’s instruction that ‘[s]ince regulating the conduct of agents at the border unquestionably has national security implications, the risk of undermining border security provides reason to hesitate before extending Bivens into this field’”; “[t]he risk that exposing Border Patrol agents to new personal liability for money damages would impede the effectiveness of their decisionmaking when discharging sensitive responsibilities”; and “[t]he existence of alternative remedies, including administrative processes, Privacy Act claims, and the Federal Tort Claims Act.”

[Editor’s note: Some of the language in the background section of the summary above was taken from the petition for writ of certiorari and brief in opposition.]

Related Posts

Related Posts

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 20

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 13

Supreme Court Report, Volume 32, Issue 6

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • Center for Consumer Protection
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2025 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, docx, xls, Max. file size: 50 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top
    To provide you more clarity about how we collect, store and use personal information, and your rights to control that information, we have updated our privacy policy, which also explains how we use cookies. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.I Agree