Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • NAAG Center on Cyber and Technology
      • NAAG Center for Excellence in Governance
      • NAAG Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • NAAG Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • NAGTRI Center for Consumer Protection
      • NAGTRI Center for Ethics & Public Integrity
      • NAGTRI Center for International Partnerships & Strategic Collaboration
      • NAGTRI Center for Leadership Development
      • NAGTRI Center for Legal Advocacy & Faculty Development
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAGTRI Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAGTRI Faculty
    • Video Library
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAGTRI
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Member Benefits
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • NAAG Center on Cyber and Technology
      • NAAG Center for Excellence in Governance
      • NAAG Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • NAAG Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • NAGTRI Center for Consumer Protection
      • NAGTRI Center for Ethics & Public Integrity
      • NAGTRI Center for International Partnerships & Strategic Collaboration
      • NAGTRI Center for Leadership Development
      • NAGTRI Center for Legal Advocacy & Faculty Development
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAGTRI Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAGTRI Faculty
    • Video Library
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAGTRI
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Report: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 22-148

Home / Supreme Court / Supreme Court Report: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 22-148
December 14, 2022 Supreme Court
Share this

  • Dan Schweitzer
    Director, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
    National Association of Attorneys General

Volume 30, Issue 3

This Report summarizes cases granted review on November 21 and December 1 and 9, 2022 (Part I).

Case Granted Review: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 22-148

Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 22-148. This case involves VIP Products’ sale of a “poop-themed” dog toy that looks like a bottle of Jack Daniel’s. The two questions are: (1) “Whether humorous use of another’s trademark as one’s own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Act’s traditional likelihood-of-confusion analysis, or instead receives heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims.” (2) “Whether humorous use of another’s mark as one’s own on a commercial product is ‘noncommercial’ under 15 U.S.C. §1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act.”

Under the Lanham Act, using another’s mark in a manner likely to cause confusion about the origin, sponsorship, or approval of a good is trademark infringement. 15 U.S.C. §§1114(1), 1125(a)(1). Courts assessing likelihood of confusion consider factors including the mark’s strength, relatedness of the goods, similarity of the parties’ marks, the defendant’s intent, and evidence of actual confusion. Additionally, under 15 U.S.C. §1125(c)(1), a “famous” mark’s owner may obtain relief against use of a mark likely to cause “dilution by blurring” or “dilution by tarnishment,” whether or not the use likely confuses consumers. Dilution by tarnishment happens when the “association” due to the “similarity between a mark or trade name and a famous mark . . . harms the reputation of the famous mark.” Id. §1125(c)(2)(C). Fair use of famous marks in noncommercial uses and parody are exempt. The fair-use exemption is limited, however, to uses “other than as a designation of source for” the defendant’s “own goods or services.” Id. §1125(c)(3)(A).

The district court granted summary judgment to Jack Daniel’s on several issues. It held that Jack Daniel’s’ trade dress and bottle design were entitled to trademark protection, and VIP was not entitled to either fair-use or First Amendment defenses. The case proceeded to a bench trial. The court found that Jack Daniel’s had established dilution by tarnishment and trademark infringement. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part. 953 F.3d 1170. Relevant here, it held that VIP’s dog toy was expressive work entitled to First Amendment protection unless Jack Daniel’s could show on remand that VIP’s use (1) is “not artistically relevant to the underlying work” or (2) “explicitly misleads consumers as to the source or content of the work.” (Quotation omitted.) Next, it held that Jack Daniel’s could not show dilution by tarnishment because VIP’s use was humorous and expressive and therefore noncommercial and protected by the First Amendment. On remand, the district court held that Jack Daniel’s failed to show lack of artistic relevance or explicit misleading, so VIP’s use was entitled to First Amendment protection.

Jack Daniel’s argues first that the Ninth Circuit erroneously grafted the atextual two-part test for First Amendment protection onto the Lanham Act. In so doing, it argues, the court improperly granted humorous use of a trademark heightened protection, which Congress did not intend. Jack Daniel’s contends that the court should have instead simply considered the humorous nature of the use in the likelihood-of-confusion test, as several other circuits do. Next, Jack Daniel’s argues that the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that VIP’s use was noncommercial because it was humorous. It points out that Congress expressly excluded parodies of famous marks from dilution claims, but only when the parody is not used “as a designation of source” for the defendant’s goods. §1125(c)(3)(A). It argues that the parody exemption is a more apt fit here than the noncommercial exemption; and the parody exemption does not apply because VIP used Jack Daniel’s mark as a designation of source. The Ninth Circuit’s decision, it claims, “improperly renders superfluous” the parody exception’s limitation to instances where the defendant is not using the mark as a designation of source.

Related Posts

Related Posts

Opinion: Biden v. Texas, 21-954

Opinion: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Org., 13-1392

Supreme Court Report: Wisconsin Legislature v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 21A471

Related Posts

  • Opinion: Biden v. Texas, 21-954
  • Opinion: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., 13-1392
  • Supreme Court Report: Wisconsin Legislature v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 21A471

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Report: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, 22-227
  • Supreme Court Report: U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc., 21-1326; U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., 22-111
  • Supreme Court Report: Pugin v. Garland, 22-23; Garland v. Cordero-Garcia, 22-331
  • Supreme Court Report: Dupree v. Younger, 22-210
  • Supreme Court Report: Yegiazaryan v. Smagin, 22-381; CMB Monaco v. Smagin, 22-383

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • NAAG Center on Cyber and Technology
      • NAAG Center for Excellence in Governance
      • NAAG Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • NAAG Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • NAGTRI Center for Consumer Protection
      • NAGTRI Center for Ethics & Public Integrity
      • NAGTRI Center for International Partnerships & Strategic Collaboration
      • NAGTRI Center for Leadership Development
      • NAGTRI Center for Legal Advocacy & Faculty Development
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAGTRI Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAGTRI Faculty
    • Video Library
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAGTRI
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Member Benefits
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2023 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.

Who is requesting this change?(Required)

Scroll To Top