Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Report: Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 20-1641

Home / Supreme Court / Supreme Court Report: Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 20-1641
June 30, 2022 Supreme Court
Share this

  • Dan Schweitzer
    Director, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
    National Association of Attorneys General

Volume 29, Issue 18

This Report summarizes opinions issued on June 21, 2022 (Part I); and cases granted review on that date (Part II).

Opinion: Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 20-1641

Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 20-1641. In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that a group health plan that provides limited benefits for outpatient dialysis, but does so uniformly for all plan participants, does not violate the Medicare Secondary Payer statute, 42 U.S.C. §1395. Congress has extended Medicare coverage to individuals with end-stage renal disease regardless of their age or other disability. By statute, Medicare is a “secondary” payer to an individual’s existing insurance plan when that plan covers the same services. DaVita provides dialysis to thousands of individuals each year, including individuals insured by their employers’ group health plans. The Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan offers the same terms of coverage for outpatient dialysis to all its participants, but those services are subject to limited reimbursement under the Plan. DaVita sued the Plan, arguing that this limited coverage violates the statute by (1) differentiating between individuals with and without end-stage renal disease, and (2) taking into account the Medicare eligibility of individuals with end-stage renal disease. The Sixth Circuit agreed with DaVita, holding that the statute prohibits plans that have a disparate impact on its participants, and that the Marietta Plan has a disparate impact on individuals with end-stage renal disease. In an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh, the Court reversed.

Given the significant costs of healthcare for those with end-stage renal disease, and worried that an insurance plan might try to deny or reduce coverage for individuals with end-stage renal disease, Congress imposed two specific constraints on group health plans. First, a plan “may not differentiate in the benefits it provides between individuals having end stage renal disease and other individuals covered by such plan on the basis of the existence of end stage renal disease, the need for renal dialysis, or in any other manner.” The Court held that the Marietta Plan does not violate this provision; to the contrary, “[t]he Marietta Plan provides the same benefits, including the same outpatient dialysis benefits, to individuals with and without end-stage renal disease.” The Court rejected DaVita’s argument that the statute forbids plans from limiting benefits in a way that has a “disparate impact” on individuals with end-stage renal disease. The Court held that the text of the statute cannot be read to encompass a disparate impact theory, and such a theory would be nearly impossible to implement―courts would need to determine what minimum level of coverage is adequate considering numerous health issues, negotiations with third parties, the needs of a particular plan’s beneficiaries, and other factors such as geography. Without any guidance in the statute, courts would be “entirely at sea.” In a footnote, the Court rejected a related “proxy” theory, where DaVita argued that singling out outpatient dialysis is an impermissible proxy for singling out individuals with end-stage renal disease because those individuals disproportionately receive outpatient dialysis. The statute forbids differentiating “benefits,” said the Court; it is not an antidiscrimination statute.

Second, the statute provides that a plan “may not take into account that an individual is entitled to or eligible for” Medicare due to end-stage renal disease. Here, found the Court, the Plan uniformly covers outpatient dialysis for all individuals. “Because the Plan provides the same outpatient dialysis benefits to all Plan participants, whether or not a participant is entitled to or eligible for Medicare, the Plan cannot be said to ‘take into account’ whether its participants are entitled to or eligible for Medicare.” The Plan does not impermissibly take into account eligibility for Medicare simply because it offers limited coverage for outpatient dialysis.

Justice Kagan dissented in part, joined by Justice Sotomayor. These two Justices agreed with the majority that the disparate-impact theory was unpersuasive and that the Marietta Plan did not improperly take Medicare eligibility into account, but they were persuaded by DaVita’s “proxy” theory. “Outpatient dialysis is an almost perfect proxy for end stage renal disease. Virtually everyone with end stage renal disease―and hardly anyone else―undergoes outpatient dialysis.” Thus, courts should not care whether a plan “differentiates in benefits by targeting people with end stage renal disease, or instead by targeting the use of dialysis.” “A reimbursement limit for outpatient dialysis is in reality a reimbursement limit for people with end stage renal disease,” and a plan singling out dialysis for disfavored coverage effectively differentiates between individuals with and without renal disease. The dissent found this conclusion bolstered by the statute’s provision that a plan may not differentiate due to the “need” for dialysis. Plans should not be able to differentiate among participants by targeting the treatment type rather than the disease when 99.5% of dialysis patients have or develop end stage renal disease. By permitting such a distinction, said the dissent, the majority undermines the statute’s purpose by allowing plans to foist the cost of dialysis onto Medicare.

 

Related Posts

Related Posts

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 20

Supreme Court Report, Volume 32, Issue 6

Supreme Court Report, Volume 31, Issue 15

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2025 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, docx, xls, Max. file size: 128 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
        To provide you more clarity about how we collect, store and use personal information, and your rights to control that information, we have updated our privacy policy, which also explains how we use cookies. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.I Agree