2022 Forensic Genetic Genealogy Webinar Series

How to Ethically and Effectively Use This Powerful Tool to Solve Serious Crimes             Virtual Hosted by NAGTRI Center for Ethics and Public Integrity, NIJ National Center on Forensics, and George Mason University   This free six-part webinar series, which is sponsored by the NIJ National Center on Forensics, provides…

Read More →

2022 Forensic Genetic Genealogy Webinar Series

How to Ethically and Effectively Use This Powerful Tool to Solve Serious Crimes             Virtual Hosted by NAGTRI Center for Ethics and Public Integrity, NIJ National Center on Forensics, and George Mason University   This free six-part webinar series, which is sponsored by the NIJ National Center on Forensics, provides…

Read More →

2022 Forensic Genetic Genealogy Webinar Series

How to Ethically and Effectively Use This Powerful Tool to Solve Serious Crimes             Virtual Hosted by NAGTRI Center for Ethics and Public Integrity, NIJ National Center on Forensics, and George Mason University   This free six-part webinar series, which is sponsored by the NIJ National Center on Forensics, provides…

Read More →

2022 Forensic Genetic Genealogy Webinar Series

How to Ethically and Effectively Use This Powerful Tool to Solve Serious Crimes               Virtual Hosted by NAGTRI Center for Ethics and Public Integrity, NIJ National Center on Forensics, and George Mason University   This free six-part webinar series, which is sponsored by the NIJ National Center on Forensics,…

Read More →

Supreme Court Report: Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States, 21-1450

Volume 30, Issue 1 This Report summarizes cases granted review on October 3, 2022 Case Granted Review: Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States, 21-1450 Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States, 21-1450. At issue is “[w]hether U.S. district courts may exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over criminal prosecutions against foreign sovereigns and their instrumentalities under 18…

Read More →

Supreme Court Report: Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, 21-887

Volume 30, Issue 1 This Report summarizes cases granted review on October 3, 2022 Case Granted Review: Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, 21-887 Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, 21-887. The Individuals with Disabilities and Education Act requires plaintiffs to exhaust administrative procedures before bringing federal, non-IDEA claims that seek relief that is also available under…

Read More →

Supreme Court Report: Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 21-1436

Volume 30, Issue 1 This Report summarizes cases granted review on October 3, 2022 Case Granted Review: Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 21-1436 Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 21-1436. This case concerns the exhaustion requirements for persons seeking review of the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals of applications for withholding of removal. Petitioner Leon Santos-Zacaria filed a…

Read More →

Supreme Court Report: Financial Oversight and Mgmt. Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, 22-96

  Volume 30, Issue 1 This Report summarizes cases granted review on October 3, 2022 Case Granted Review: Financial Oversight and Mgmt. Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, 22-96 Financial Oversight and Mgmt. Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, 22-96. Congress enacted the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic…

Read More →

Supreme Court Report: Glacier Northwest v. Int’l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 21-1449

Volume 30, Issue 1 This Report summarizes cases granted review on October 3, 2022 Case Granted Review: Glacier Northwest v. Int’l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 21-1449 Glacier Northwest v. Int’l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 21-1449. The Court will resolve whether “the National Labor Relations Act impliedly preempt[s] a state tort claim against a union for intentionally destroying…

Read More →

Supreme Court Report: In re Grand Jury, 21-1397

Volume 30, Issue 1 This Report summarizes cases granted review on October 3, 2022 Case Granted Review: In re Grand Jury, 21-1397 In re Grand Jury, 21-1397. The question presented is “[w]hether a communication involving both legal and non-legal advice is protected by attorney-client privilege where obtaining or providing legal advice was one of the…

Read More →