Maine v. Maine Health Alliance, No. CV-03-135 (Kennebec Super Ct. 2003)

Complaint, parallel to FTC action against same Defendants, charges that PHO engaged in price-fixing and concerted refusals to deal in contracting with managed care payors.

Read More →

New York v. Brooks Drug, Inc, et al., 90 Civ. 4330 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

Various pharmacy firms engaged in collusion regarding New York State’s prescription program for state employees.

Read More →

California v. Valero Energy Corp., No. 01-10895 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2001)

States sought to enjoin the proposed merger between Valero Energy Corporation (Valero) and Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation (Ultramar), arguing that the merger would substantially lessen competition in the bulk supply and wholesale marketing of gasoline.

Read More →

Ohio v. British Petroleum et al.

State of Ohio filed a complaint regarding the BP/Amoco merger, alleging potential violations of state antitrust laws.

Read More →

Missouri, et al vs. Arch Coal, Inc and New Vulcan Coal Holdings, LLC and Triton Coal Company, LLC, US District Court, District of Columbia – No. 1:04CV00535

Merger review of two of the most dominant coal producers in the Permian Basin.

Read More →

Texas v. El Paso Energy Corporation and PG&E Corporation; No. GV003437, 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County

Merger review of El Paso Energy Corp acquisition of PG&E Corporation

Read More →

In the Matter of Schnucks Markets, Inc.

States reached settlement agreement with retail seller of food and grocery store products requiring specified divestitures in concentrated markets; subsequent settlement agreement reached resolving allegation of violation of divestiture agreement

Read More →

Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Southern Union Co. et al.

State sought to enjoin merger or to remedy anti competitive effects from proposed acquisition of pipeline.

Read More →

Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Conoco, Inc.,

State sought to enjoin merger or to remedy anticompetitive effects from proposed acquisition by petroleum company of competitor.

Read More →

FTC and Puerto Rico v. College of Physician-Surgeons of Puerto Rico, No. 971 0011(D.P.R. Oct. 2. 1997)

Puerto Rico College of Physician surgeons sought to act on behalf of all Puerto Rico doctors to raise prices paid by the state for indigent care, and called for a strike which resulted in increaed hospital costs for consumers.

Read More →