Texas v. ACE Holdings, Inc.

Consent decrees filed by states in state court required $4.5 million payment and conduct relief to remedy alleged bid-rigging and false insurance quotes, as well as payment of secret “contingent commissions” to brokers.

Read More →

State of Colorado et al v. Warner Chilcott, 1:05-cv-02182 (D.D.C.2005)

34 states filed suit alleging that Warner Chilcott entered into an illegal agreement with Barr Pharmaceuticals to raise the prices of Ovcon, an oral contraceptive. The lawsuit alleged that after Barr Pharmaceuticals publicly announced that it planned to have a generic version of Ovcon on the market by the end of the year, Warner Chilcott paid Barr Pharmaceuticals $1 million for an agreement designed to prevent Barr’s generic product from coming to market. Under the terms of the alleged agreement, once Barr received FDA approval to market generic Ovcon, Warner Chilcott had 90 days to pay Barr $19 million, after which Barr would refuse to bring the cheaper generic version to the market. The lawsuit alleged that as a result of the agreement, Warner Chilcott paid Barr a total of $20 million to keep it from marketing its generic version of Ovcon. In additon to a payment of $5.5 million, the settlement prohibits Warner Chilcott, for ten years, from entering into any agreement that would have the effect of limiting the research, development, manufacture, or sale of a generic alternative to one of its drugs. Furthermore, Warner Chilcott must provide the states notice of certain agreements it has entered into with generic manufacturers, and must continue to make its records available to the states for inspection to determine whether the company is complying with the terms of the agreement.

Read More →

Texas v. American International Group Inc., No. D-1-6v-08-000197 (98th Dist. 2007)

Ten states resolved claims that AIG, an insurer, had participated in a bid-rigging scheme run by Marsh McLennan, an insurance broker.

Read More →

Texas v. Zurich American Insurance Company (In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Lit. (D.C. No. 04-cv-05184, D.N.J.)

Zurich settled claims involving payment of contingent commissions and submission of false bids for insurance coverage.

Read More →

U.S. and Texas, et al v. Oracle, Corporation, No.C-04 0807 (JCS )(N.D.Cal.2005)

Merger review of two of the most dominant vendors of high function Human Resource Management software and high function Financial Management Services software.

Read More →

R & D Business Systems, et al vs. Xerox Corp. (Texas as intervenor) Civ.No. 2:92-CV-042, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division

State of Texas intervened in previously filed private suit, alleging Xerox attempted to monopolize, tied parts to service and organized group boycott

Read More →

Texas v. Bill Garland Trucking et al., 1991-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,381 (Travis Cty. Texas 1991)

State alleged bid-rigging in the purchase of heavy equipment, trucks and graders by Wise County from 1980 on.

Read More →

Texas v. Valley Memorial Gardens, Inc., 1991-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,383 (Travis Cty. Texas, 1991)

State alleged violations of state antitrust law in pricing of crematory services

Read More →

Texas v. Rose Lawn Memorial Gardens of Brownsville, Texas, Inc., et al. 1991-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,384 (1991)

State of Texas sued Defendants, alleging they conspired to fix prices of crematory services in Cameron & Hildago Counties of Texas

Read More →

John T. Gesin, et al vs. Texas; Cause No. 91-2791; 261st Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas

Defendants filed for declaration Judgment. Texas countersued Defendants for damages, civil penalties, injunction and attorney fees, alleging they conspired to boycott a low-cost veterinarian in Austin, Texas

Read More →