Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • NAAG Center on Cyber and Technology
      • NAAG Center for Excellence in Governance
      • NAAG Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • NAAG Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • NAGTRI Center for Consumer Protection
      • NAGTRI Center for Ethics & Public Integrity
      • NAGTRI Center for International Partnerships & Strategic Collaboration
      • NAGTRI Center for Leadership Development
      • NAGTRI Center for Legal Advocacy & Faculty Development
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAGTRI Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAGTRI Faculty
    • Video Library
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAGTRI
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Member Benefits
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • NAAG Center on Cyber and Technology
      • NAAG Center for Excellence in Governance
      • NAAG Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • NAAG Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • NAGTRI Center for Consumer Protection
      • NAGTRI Center for Ethics & Public Integrity
      • NAGTRI Center for International Partnerships & Strategic Collaboration
      • NAGTRI Center for Leadership Development
      • NAGTRI Center for Legal Advocacy & Faculty Development
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAGTRI Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAGTRI Faculty
    • Video Library
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAGTRI
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Allows Creditors to Retain Assets Lawfully Seized Prior to Bankruptcy

Home / Bankruptcy / Supreme Court Allows Creditors to Retain Assets Lawfully Seized Prior to Bankruptcy
February 9, 2021 Bankruptcy, Supreme Court
Share this

  • Karen Cordry
    Bankruptcy and State Defensive Litigation Chief Counsel
    National Association of Attorneys General

The Bankruptcy Code (title 11 of the United States Code) provides numerous protections for debtors when they file a bankruptcy petition. Those protections include an automatic stay of “any act to obtain possession of . . . or to exercise control over property of the estate.” §362(a)(3). Section 542(a) of the Code states that a creditor “shall deliver to the trustee” any property of the estate, but subject to a proviso that guarantees that a party holding an interest (such as a lien) in estate property is entitled to “adequate protection” of that interest before the creditor can be required to allow the debtor to use that property. § 363(e).

In its recent decision, City of Chicago, Ill. v. Fulton et. al, No. 19-357 2021 WL 125106 (U.S. Jan. 14, 2021), the U.S. Supreme Court discussed how those provisions should be reconciled. The City of Chicago had a program under which it would impound vehicles of drivers who had accumulated a significant number of unpaid traffic and/or parking violations. Fulton and other debtors filed Chapter 13 petitions (which are set up to allow debtors to pay off some or all of their obligations over time) and requested that their cars be returned immediately. The City refused to do so, in large part because its statutory lien on the vehicles was a possessory lien that, the City asserted, would be lost if it returned the vehicles. The bankruptcy court and the Seventh Circuit held that the City’s actions violated the automatic stay. The issues addressed by the Supreme Court were whether mere “retention” of property lawfully seized before the petition date was an “act to . . . exercise control” over that property, and whether the creditor had an affirmative duty to turn over the vehicles after the Chapter 13 filing under Section 542.

The case aroused considerable amicus interest with briefs in support of Chicago filed by the United States, the International Municipal Lawyers’ Association, the National Association of Counties, the National League of Cities, the United States Conference of Mayors and other governmental groups, all of which argued that, as a matter of statutory construction, retaining possession was not an “act,”  that Section 542 language was not self-executing, and that, to regain their vehicles, debtors must file an “adversary proceeding,” which is largely akin to a non-bankruptcy complaint. The debtors, on the other hand, did not lack for supporters. They were represented by Eugene Wedoff, a recently-retired and very highly respected bankruptcy judge from Illinois, and had several amicus briefs filed on their behalf including by the National Associations of Chapter Thirteen and Bankruptcy Trustees, the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center, and several well-known bankruptcy law professors.

On the merits, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the City based on a straightforward statutory analysis. In large part, it started and ended with the idea that the word “act” is normally thought to require that something affirmative occur, not just a maintenance of the status quo. It further held that the turnover provisions in Section 542 were not automatically self-executing, because there needed to be a method for the creditor to demand the adequate protection that it was entitled to under Section 363. There were no dissents, but there was a concurrence by Justice Sotomayor that focused on the practical crux of the problem here – i.e., that, while she agreed with the Court that the City had the better of the bare legal argument, Mr. Fulton and his supporters had a strong argument on the real-life consequences aspect of the dispute.

The basic problem is that while filing an adversary proceeding may not be overly burdensome for a business seeking to deal with a lien on a major piece of equipment, it is likely to be quite difficult for individuals in Chapter 13 to come up with the additional funds necessary for such a hearing – just as they could not find the money to pay the fines in the first place. As a result, they may have no way to regain their vehicles for an extended time and, absent those vehicles, they often may not be able to reach their jobs, earn their wages, or comply with their proposed Chapter 13 plan payments. If so, and if their case fails, the result can leave all creditors, including the City, worse off, Justice Sotomayor noted. The City and its other governmental supporters, on the other hand, argued that the alternative reading Mr. Fulton and his supporters suggested, under which the government should be required to file emergency motions in each case to obtain protection for its interests, is not very workable either.

Justice Sotomayor closed with a very sensible conclusion: “Ultimately, however, any gap left by the Court’s ruling today is best addressed by rule drafters and policymakers, not bankruptcy judges.”  The Rule Committee could consider specific treatment to speed up and/or simplify this category of small asset turnovers and Congress too could enact a statutory fix, tailored to this particular problem. Until then, this ruling leaves creditors in general and governmental entities in particular with two statutory construction holdings that provide them with significant benefits going forward.

Additional Resources

Discover the role of attorneys general in bankruptcy enforcement.

Related Posts

Related Posts

Bankruptcy next exit sign

Notice Issues in the Age of Social Media

U.S. Supreme Court

Challenge to the FTC’s Restitution Authority to be Heard by Supreme Court

Bankruptcy court sign

Supreme Court Allows Creditors to Retain Assets Lawfully Seized Prior to Bankruptcy

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • NAAG Center on Cyber and Technology
      • NAAG Center for Excellence in Governance
      • NAAG Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • NAAG Center for Tobacco & Public Health
      • NAGTRI Center for Consumer Protection
      • NAGTRI Center for Ethics & Public Integrity
      • NAGTRI Center for International Partnerships & Strategic Collaboration
      • NAGTRI Center for Leadership Development
      • NAGTRI Center for Legal Advocacy & Faculty Development
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • ConsumerResources.org
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAGTRI Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAGTRI Faculty
    • Video Library
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAGTRI
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • NAGTRI
  • Member Benefits
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2023 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, Max. file size: 50 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top