Ohio v. A.F. Beil Electric, Inc. et al.
State of Ohio on behalf of Youngstown State University filed suit against the defendants for bid-rigging. The alleged activity surrounded the electrical bid for the construction of a new stadium at Youngstown State. Case settled
Utah v. Visual Technology, Inc. (Case No. 1999-820-254) (Settlement Agreement)
After an investigation into Visual Technology, Inc.’s bidding practices in connection with a University of Utah invitation to bid on audio visual equipment the parties reached a settlement.
Utah v. Signing Resource, LLC, et al. (Civ. No. 050909852) (3rd Dis. Utah, 2005)
State brought action against sign language interpreters alleging bid-rigging and price fixing in the market for sign language interpreters provided to State agencies in Utah
Utah v. Nuttall Bernina (Civ. No. 000903757 (3rd Dist. Utah, 2000)
State of Utah investigated Nuttall Bernina and Dave’s Bernina, alleging market allocation, price fixing and bid-rigging in sales of Bernina sewing machines to school districts in Salt Lake and Utah counties.
California v. Nationwide Wire & Brush, No. 05AS03942 (Ca. Super. Ct. Sept. 2005)
Street sweeping brush manufacturers allegedly set up a territorial allocation scheme and engaged in bid-rigging and solicitation to engage in bid-rigging.
California v. American Rotary Broom, No. GIC 853579 (Cal. Super. Ct. Sept. 2005)
Street sweeping brush manufacturers allegedly set up a territorial allocation scheme and engaged in bid-rigging and solicitation to engage in bid-rigging.
Texas v. Bill Garland Trucking et al., 1991-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,381 (Travis Cty. Texas 1991)
State alleged bid-rigging in the purchase of heavy equipment, trucks and graders by Wise County from 1980 on.
In the Matter of Medical Transportation Management, Inc.,–Letter Agreement from Missouri AG, Sept. 21, 2005)
Incumbent broker of non-emergency transportation services under state-wide contract entered into exclusive dealing agreements with providers in network allegedly preventing market entry by other brokers to compete for state contract; later prospective entrant and incumbent broker entered into acquisition agreement and submitted joint bid for state contract.
Delaware v. Mid-Atlantic Paving Company, Inc., No. 7197, (Del. Ch. filed Jun. 1, 1983)
Delaware sought civil penalties, equitable relief, damages, fees and costs, alleging Defendant, Mid-Atlantic Paving Company, Inc., participated in conspiracies to rig bids in connection with the supply of liquid asphalt in the State of Delaware.
Delaware v. The Lansdell Corp. of Md., Inc., No. 7174, (Del. Ch. filed Apr. 29, 1983)
Delaware sought civil penalties, equitable relief, damages, fees and costs, alleging Defendant, The Lansdell Corporation of Maryland, Inc., participated in conspiracies to rig bids in connection with the supply of liquid asphalt in the State of Delaware
