In re Intertrack Wagering Investigation (18th Jud. Cir. Seminole County, FL, 1992)

The State of Florida sought injunctive relief, alleging that Florida Jai-Alai, Inc. Seminole Racing, Inc. and Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, Inc. (SOKC) engaged in a conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition, and to restrain trade by allocating intertrack wagering dates.

Read More →

NASCAR Investigation (Florida)

The State of Florida investigated Americrown Services Corporation (Americrown), a subsidiary of International Speedway Corporation, for alleged price fixing by imposing a minimum pricing schedule upon any vendor selling merchandise on Americrown?s Speedway property.

Read More →

New York v. Brown, No. 88-1512, (D.N.J) 721 F.Supp 629 (D.N.J.), summ. judg. den; 721 F.Supp 644 (D. NJ),

The New York Attorney General’s Office brought a suit against New Jersey officials that challenged the constitutionality of a New Jersey regulation that prevented the sale of milk below cost. The regulation was repealed in 1990.

Read More →

Pennsylvania v. Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh/UPMC (Oct. 2001)

Consent decree entered by Pennsylvania AG with Children’s Hospital and UPMC.

Read More →

New York v. Tele-Communications Inc., 1993 WL 527984 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 1993), 1993-2 Trade Cases P 70, 404

Defendant cable system operators, subsidiaries and a satellite cable supplier formed a monopoly in restraint of trade in the delivery of multichannel subscription television programming.

Read More →

New York v. Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., No. 06 401726, NY S, Ct.

Charges four-year pervasive bid-rigging and anti-competitive customer allocation scheme, in exchange for illegal payments. In 2010, Liberty Mutual agreed to pay $5.5 million to NY and $2 million to Connecticut to settle the allegations.

Read More →

Pennsylvania v. Altoona Hospital and Bon Secours Holy Family Regional Health System (Oct. 2004)

Altoona Hospital and Bon Secours merger allowed as long as the merged hospital system follows the requirements outlined in the consent decree.

Read More →

Pennslyvania v. Conemaugh Memorial and UPMC Lee (Jul. 2005)

Consent decree filed by Pennsylviana AG, allowing Conemaugh and UPMC Lee merger as long as certain requirements are followed.

Read More →

Florida v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation, Healthtrust, Inc., Memorial Health Systems, Inc. and Halifax Hospital Medical Center

As part of a negotiated settlement, the State of Florida and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sought to enjoin the merger of defendant hospital facilities, alleging that such acquisitions would result in a substantial reduction of competition in the marketplace for medical care.

Read More →

GTE Inside Wire Investigation (1995)

As part of a negotiated settlement, the State of Florida sought to permanently enjoin GTE Florida Incorporated (GTE) from continuing its sales tactics concerning its ?Lineskeeper Inside Wire Maintenance? service. The state alleged that once the service became optional, GTE would automatically enroll customers unless they notified GTE that they did not want the service, hence constituting an illegal tying arrangement.

Read More →