California v. Acme Rotary Broom, No. 05CECL06793 (Cal. Super. Ct. Sept. 2005)

Street sweeping brush manufacturers allegedly set up a territorial allocation scheme and engaged in bid-rigging and solicitation to engage in bid-rigging.

Read More →

Washington v. Wenatchee Valley Clinic, 1988-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,118 (E.D. Wash. 1988)

State sought damages and injunctive relief, alleging that Defendant health care providers conspired to fix the price for the delivery or sale of emergency medical services or other health care services. Further, the Plaintiff State alleged that Defendants allocated the markets for the sale of ambulatory surgery facility services, radiation facility services or other health care services.

Read More →

Tennessee v. Sam Lutter Oil Co., No. 3-96-0778 (M.D. Tenn., Aug., 22, 1996)

State sought damages, civil penalties and forfeiture of the corporate charter, alleging that Defendant, Sam Lutter Oil, Co., conspired with others to fix the retail prices of gasoline.

Read More →

New York v. Urethane Applicators, Inc.; No. Cv 94 2705 (E.D.N.Y.).

New York sued several roofing contractors on behalf of the state and its political subdivisions, including the Connetquot Central School District on Long Island, for injunctive relief, civil penalties and treble damages, alleging bid-rigging and market allocation.

Read More →

New York v. Daicel Chemical Industries et al

Charges seventeen-year international conspiracy to fix the price of sorbates, a preservative used in many foods and beverages.

Read More →

Washington v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Walla Walla, et. al, CY 90-3032AAM, USDC Eastern District of Washington

The State alleged that defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices, rotate bids, allocate locations of vending machines and eliminate discounts.

Read More →